Zapier vs Make vs n8n
Choosing an automation platform is a $10K-$100K+ decision over 3 years. We've implemented all three for clients—here's what actually matters.
| Feature | Zapier | Make (Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best For | Beginners, quick setup, non-technical teams | Medium complexity, visual workflows | Developers, self-hosting, unlimited scale |
| Integrations | 6,000+ — Largest library | 1,500+ — Strong coverage | 300+ — Custom HTTP/API for rest |
| Ease of Use | Easiest — Drag and drop | Medium — Learning curve | Technical — Requires dev skills |
| Visual Builder | Excellent — Linear workflows | Best — Scenarios with branching | Good — Node-based canvas |
| Complex Logic | Limited — If/then, filters | Excellent — Full conditionals, loops | Best — Code-level control |
| Self-Hosting | No — SaaS only | No — SaaS only | Yes — Open source, own server |
| Data Privacy | Data passes through Zapier servers | Data passes through Make servers | Complete control — Your infrastructure |
| Error Handling | Basic — Retry settings | Good — Error handlers, fallbacks | Best — Custom error workflows |
| Japanese Services | LINE, Slack, Notion, many SaaS | Similar to Zapier via APIs | Any with API — custom integration |
| Pricing Model | Per task (workflow run) | Per operation (module execution) | Free (self-host) or per workflow |
| Entry Price | Free (100 tasks/mo), then $20/mo | Free (1,000 ops/mo), then $9/mo | Free (self-host), then $20/mo (cloud) |
When to Choose Each Platform
Zapier
- ✓ Non-technical team members need to build automations
- ✓ Quick proof-of-concept before committing
- ✓ You need an integration that only Zapier has
- ✓ Budget isn't a primary concern
- ✓ Linear, simple workflows (A → B → C)
Make (Integromat)
- ✓ Complex workflows with branching logic
- ✓ Data transformation and formatting needed
- ✓ Visual debugging of workflows
- ✓ Mid-level technical team
- ✓ Need operations history and logs
n8n
- ✓ High-volume automations (100K+ runs/mo)
- ✓ Data must stay on your infrastructure
- ✓ Developer team available
- ✓ Need custom integrations
- ✓ Cost optimization at scale
Business Use Case Recommendations
Real automation scenarios and which platform handles each best.
📧 Email → CRM Sync
New leads from email → add to Salesforce/HubSpot
→ Zapier (quickest setup)
📊 Multi-Step Data Processing
Webhook → transform → filter → conditional routing
→ Make (best visual logic)
🔄 High-Volume E-commerce
10,000+ orders/day sync between platforms
→ n8n (no per-task fees)
📱 Chatbot Backend
LINE/Slack bot with AI responses
→ Make or n8n (API flexibility)
🔐 Sensitive Financial Data
Payroll, banking data transfers
→ n8n (self-hosted, data control)
🗓️ Calendar Automation
Meeting scheduling, reminders, follow-ups
→ Zapier (native calendar apps)
🏗️ Custom Internal Tools
Combine multiple APIs into internal workflow
→ n8n (unlimited customization)
📈 Dashboard Updates
Aggregate data → Google Sheets/Airtable
→ Zapier (best spreadsheet apps)
Cost at Scale (Real Numbers)
Based on 350+ client implementations across Japan.
Zapier
Starter: 750 tasks
- Good for: <1000 workflows/month
- At 10K tasks: ~$89/mo
- At 100K tasks: ~$599/mo
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
⚠️ Gets expensive at volume
Make
Core: 10,000 operations
- Good for: Medium complexity
- At 50K ops: ~$29/mo
- At 500K ops: ~$99/mo
- Better value than Zapier
✓ Best value for most teams
n8n
Self-hosted: Free
- Good for: High volume, developers
- Cloud: $20/mo (5K executions)
- Self-host: Server costs only
- Typical: $20-50/mo hosting
✓ Lowest cost at any scale
Not Sure Which to Choose?
We've set up all three platforms for Japanese businesses. The right choice depends on your volume, technical skills, and integration needs. A 30-minute call can save you months of trial and error.
Talk to an Automation Expert